galactically: (... what)
Sheryl Nome ([personal profile] galactically) wrote2016-09-04 02:16 pm
Entry tags:

Catch-all overflow post

In case of terrible captcha...

[personal profile] ex_adept179 2016-09-13 10:11 am (UTC)(link)
That strikes me as deeply unfortunate.

[Seeing people as an idea rather than a whole.

Of course, he doesn't recall his lone friendship in his life may well have been deemed this]

[personal profile] ex_adept179 2016-09-15 11:32 am (UTC)(link)
[Slaine is silent at first, as he considers those words. He finds himself once more surprised that Sheryl has dwelt on something that he'd said some time ago, thinking his opinion nominal at best in terms of importance.

Surely, gods have more pressing matters to focus on]


...I see no reason that you should thank me. [A beat, before he thinks to add-] I was simply being forthright in my opinions.

[As that is all that they are]

[personal profile] ex_adept179 2016-09-19 12:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it unacceptable — I merely acknowledge it isn't always possible.

[And on that, Slaine understands they disagree. He'd never say that people shouldn't be able to do better, especially if their merits should warrant it, but he's quite certain that isn't always within the realm of possibility.

No matter how one might strive or achieve, some things remain beyond reach]


It seems to me that pity is looking down on another. Sympathetically, perhaps, but looking down all the same.

[personal profile] ex_adept179 2016-09-20 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's say someone with considerable power saw fit to use it poorly. Perhaps he uses it to deny those with less any resources or means, or actively oppresses them, threatening death should they oppose. Under such conditions, with no one and nothing, an individual may have no viable opportunities.

[He's quiet after saying this, seeming to have nothing further to say. But he does speak up, after puffing out a tense breath.

The subject is difficult, even if he doesn't know why]


If people were to pity you... Do you not suppose that reflects on something within themselves?